[aioseo_breadcrumbs]
Assessment
End of section 5 questions
- Think of a theory commonly used in your field. Is there an African or locally relevant alternative or adaptation, and if not, what might one look like?
- How would you word a comment asking an author to increase the proportion of African references, without discouraging them?
- What is one specific sign, beyond fluent but generic writing, that might make you suspect undisclosed AI use in a manuscript?
Quiz for this section
Q16. Is the use of lived experience and orature acceptable evidence in a manuscript reviewed under Mtandao’s guidelines?
- a) No, only peer reviewed sources are acceptable
- b) Yes, provided it is corroborated and used with rigour
- c) Only in book reviews, not journal manuscripts
- d) Only if translated into a European language
Correct answer: b
Q17. What are authors expected to do when no established African theory exists for their topic?
- a) Use a Western theory without adaptation
- b) Omit theory from the manuscript entirely
- c) Propose their own framework
- d) Ask the reviewer to supply a theory
Correct answer: c
Q18. What is the AJSW position on AI generated reviews?
- a) They are accepted if disclosed
- b) They are not accepted
- c) They are required for all submissions
- d) They are accepted only for book reviews
Correct answer: b
Q19. If an author has used AI in preparing a manuscript, what is required?
- a) Nothing, AI use does not need to be disclosed
- b) The manuscript must be rejected automatically
- c) AI use must be acknowledged in writing, and cannot replace the author’s own critical thinking
- d) The reviewer must rewrite the manuscript
Correct answer: c